1. On the morning of March 4th, with 32% of the vote counted, Bernie Sanders had a 9.4% lead over Joe Biden:
Sanders 29.0% Biden 19.6% 2. A day later on March 5th, with 57% of the vote counted, Bernie still maintained around a 9% lead in California. 3. Today (March 11th), more than a week after the primary, only 85% of the votes in California have been counted and Bernie's lead has SHRUNK to 6.8% Sanders 34.2% Biden 27.4% Welcome to Maduroland! Note: By March 11th, 2020, all other Super Tuesday States have 99% or 100% of votes counted for their Democrat Primaries! Sources: - https://twitter.com/PpollingNumbers/status/1235082873952059393?s=20 - https://edition.cnn.com/election/2020/primaries-and-caucuses
0 Comments
1. GOP turnout was similar to 2018 and 2008, but almost half of 2016 and 2012 and below Barack Obama's Democrat primary turnout in 2012 2. Democrat turnout was over double 2018, about 20,000 more than 2016 and about the same as 2008 Vermont will remain blue. Sources:
2020: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2020_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2020_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2018: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_United_States_House_of_Representatives_election_in_Vermont 2016: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2016_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2016_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2012: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2012_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2008: Dem: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_vote_count.html GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2008_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 1. GOP caucuses are on April 17th, 2020 2. Democrat turnout was off the scale, over 500,000 more than 2016, and over 300,000 more than 2008. Virginia will likely remain blue, unless there is a hyper MASSIVE turnout by Trump supporters in the general election in November 2020. Sources:
2020: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2020_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2020_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2018: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections_in_Virginia 2016: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2016_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2016_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2012: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2012_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2008: Dem: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_vote_count.html GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2008_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 1. GOP turnout was almost 100,000 higher than 2016, over 50.000 higher than 2012 and similar to 2008 2. Democrat turnout was over double 2016, and over 40,000 higher than 2008. Utah will, most likely, remain red, but Trump supporters in the State should not take anything for granted! Sources:
2020: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2020_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2020_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2018: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections_in_Utah 2016: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2016_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2016_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2012: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2012_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2008: Dem: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_vote_count.html GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2008_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 1. GOP turnout was almost 1 million less than 2016, but about 500,000 higher than 2012 and 2008, and over THREE times Barack Obama's Democrat primary turnout in 2012 2. Democrat turnout was about 700,000 higher than 2018, 400,000 higher than 2016, but about 1 million BELOW 2008 Warning Sign: Texas will, most likely, remain red, but there MUST be a MASSIVE turnout by Trump supporters in the general election in November 2020, far higher than the knife edge between Robert "Beto" O'Rourke and Ted Cruz in 2018 due to lackadaisical Republican turnout well below 2016 levels! Sources:
2020: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2020_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2020_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2018: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections_in_Texas 2016: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2016_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2016_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2012: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2012_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2008: Dem: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_vote_count.html GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2008_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 1. GOP turnout was almost half of 2018, less than half of 2016 and significantly lower than 2012 and 2008, but over FOUR times Barack Obama's Democrat primary turnout in 2012 2. Democrat turnout was over 100,000 higher than 2018 and 2016, but over 100,000 lower than 2008 Tennessee will, most likely, remain red, but Trump supporters in the State should not take anything for granted! Sources:
2020: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2020_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2020_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2018: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections_in_Tennessee 2016: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2016_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2016_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2012: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2012_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2008: Dem: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_vote_count.html GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2008_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 1. GOP turnout was almost 200,000 below 2016, similar to 2012 and about 40,000 below 2008, but over double Barack Obama's Democrat primary turnout in 2012 2. Democrat turnout was depressed, almost 100,000 below 2018 and 2008 and about 30,000 below 2016 Oklahoma will remain red. Sources:
2020: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2020_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2020_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2018: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections_in_Oklahoma 2016: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2016_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2016_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2012: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2012_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2008: Dem: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_vote_count.html GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2008_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 1. GOP turnout was depressed, well below 2016 and 2012 and, cruicually, almost 200,000 below Barack Obama's Democrat primary turnout in 2012 2. Democrat turnout was very high, almost 200,000 above 2018, over 100,000 above 2016 but still about 300,000 below 2008 level RED FLAG: North Carolina could flip blue without a MASSIVE turnout by Trump supporters in the general election in November 2020. Sources:
2020: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2020_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2020_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2018: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections_in_North_Carolina 2016: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2016_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2016_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2012: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2012_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2008: Dem: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_vote_count.html GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2008_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 1. GOP turnout was over 20,000 higher than 2016, almost THREE times higher than 2012, double 2008 and almost EIGHT times Barack Obama's Democrat primary turnout in 2012 2. Democrat turnout was off the scale, almost FOUR times 2016 and 2008 Flipping Minnesota red will require a MASSIVE turnout by Trump supporters in the general election in November 2020. Sources:
2020: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2020_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2020_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2018: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections_in_Minnesota 2016: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2016_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2016_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2012: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2012_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2008: Dem: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_vote_count.html GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2008_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 1. GOP turnout was almost half of 2018 but over DOUBLE 2016 and about EIGHT times 2012 and 2008 2. Democrat turnout was off the scale, over one and a half times 2018 Maine will remain blue, and there is a high risk that Senator Susan Collins will lose her seat to her Democrat challenger. Sources:
2020: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2020_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2020_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2018: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections_in_Maine 2016: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2016_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2016_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2012: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2012_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2008: Dem: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_vote_count.html GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2008_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 1. GOP turnout was well below 2016, 2012 and 2008 2. Democrat turnout was off the scale, similar to 2018 and well above 2016 and 2008 Massachusetts will remain blue. Sources:
2020: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2020_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2020_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2018: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections_in_Massachusetts 2016: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2016_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2016_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2012: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2012_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2008: Dem: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_vote_count.html GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2008_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 1. GOP turnout was almost 200,000 higher than 2018 and over TEN times higher than 2012 and 2008 2. Warning Sign: Democrat turnout was off the scale, significantly above 2018, SEVEN times 2016 and almost EIGHT times 2008 Flipping Colorado red will require a MASSIVE turnout by Trump supporters in the general election in November 2020. Sources:
2020: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2020_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2020_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2018: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections_in_Colorado 2016: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2016_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2016_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2012: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2012_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2008: Dem: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_vote_count.html GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2008_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 1. GOP turnout was similar to 2016 2. Democrat turnout was similar to 2016 Arkansas will remain red. Sources:
2020: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2020_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2020_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2018: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections_in_Arkansas 2016: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2016_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2016_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2012: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2012_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2008: Dem: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_vote_count.html GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2008_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 1. GOP turnout was well above 2012 and 2008 2. Democrat turnout was above 2016 and 2012 but well below 2008 Alabama will remain red. And it is likely that the anomaly known as Doug Jones will be disappeared! Sources:
2020: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2020_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2020_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2018: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections_in_Alabama 2016: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2016_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2016_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2012: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2012_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2008: Dem: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_vote_count.html GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2008_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries Only 225 out 415 delegates assigned in California - an increase of just 31 from Thursday morning.
What was going on? Ballot harvesting in Biden's favor, perhaps? Source: https://edition.cnn.com/election/2020/primaries-and-caucuses CA: 57% counted, 194/415 delegates not assigned!!
NC: 88% counted, 54/110 delegates not assigned CO: 99% counted, 20/67 delegates not assigned OK: 87% counted, 32/37 delegates not assigned TN: 86% counted, 30/64 delegates not assigned UT: 91% counted, 26/29 delegates not assigned AL: 82% counted, 19/52 delegates not assigned AR: 84% counted, 11/31 delegates not assigned ME: 92% counted, 8/24 delegates not assigned MA: 96% counted, 17/91 delegates not assigned MN: 86% counted, 8/75 delegates not assigned 1. Warning Sign: Democrat primary turnout (527,728) was the highest in past 12 years, higher than 2016 AND 2008! - 143.1% of 2016 Democrat primary turnout - 61.7% of 2016 and 69.6% of 2018 Democrat general election turnouts 2. I am very suspicious about Democrat voter registration drives. Although I can't prove it, there's circumstantial statistical evidence to suggest that, especially in the black community, Democrats vote Democrat for registered poorer black voters who are too busy surviving and have not actually voted. The high turnouts are simply inconsistent with the absurdly low enthusiasm such as abysmally small size of "rallies". On the other hand, it could also have been Trump supporters causing trouble in the open South Carolina primary based on instructions received at the Trump rally! 3. More confirmation that MSM polls are complete garbage. The science of statistical sampling using relatively small samples of a much larger "population" of something, is very solid and accurate. But the scientific method is only as good or bad as the human being using or misusing it. The reason why MSM polling firms are often wildly wrong is that they rig the samples to fit the required media narratives. This is statistical butchery because the sampling is supposed to be RANDOM! RCP Poll Average versus Primary Results (-/+): Biden: RCP: 39.7% Primary Election: 48.5% Difference: +8.8% Sanders: RCP: 24.3% Primary Election: 19.9% Difference: -4.4% Steyer: RCP: 11.7% Primary Election: 11.3%, Difference: -0.4% Buttigieg: RCP: 11.3% Primary Election: 8.2%, Difference: -3.1% Warren: RCP: 6.0% Primary Election: 7.1% Difference: +1.1% Sources:
2020: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2020_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2020_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries Political Polls (@PpollingNumbers): https://twitter.com/PpollingNumbers/status/1234020573568782337?s=20 2018: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections_in_South Carolina 2016: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2016_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2016_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2012: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2012_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2008: Dem: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_vote_count.html GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2008_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries Impossible to do a popular vote turnout comparison because the Democrat Nevada caucus is completely closed. As democratic as the Democratic People's Republic of Korea? Sources:
2020: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2020_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2020_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2018: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections_in_Nevada 2016: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2016_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2016_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2012: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2012_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2008: Dem: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_vote_count.html GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2008_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 1. GOP turnout was well below Democrat turnout but significantly higher than Obama in 2012 AND GOP Midterms in 2018! 2. Warning Sign: Democrat turnout was significantly higher than 2016 and 2008! Sources:
2020: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2020_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2020_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2018: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections_in_New_Hampshire 2016: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2016_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2016_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2012: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2012_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2008: Dem: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_vote_count.html GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2008_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 1. GOP turnout was well below Democrat turnout but significantly higher than Obama in 2012. Voters getting lazy is to be expected for an incumbent President, don't be lazy in November! 2. Democrat turnout can't be compared to 2016 because: secret! Sources:
2020: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2020_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2020_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2018: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2018_United_States_House_of_Representatives_elections_in_Iowa 2016: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2016_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2016_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2012: Dem: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2012_Democratic_Party_presidential_primaries GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2012_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries 2008: Dem: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/2008/president/democratic_vote_count.html GOP: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Results_of_the_2008_Republican_Party_presidential_primaries www.amazon.com/dp/1096969238
Link: www.amazon.com/dp/1096969238 Joe Biden’s Brother James Receives Unusually Generous Loans While Joe Biden Sits on the Senate Banking Committee
Trial Lawyers Enlist James Biden’s Assistance in a Multibillion-Dollar Tobacco Case Joe Biden’s Sister Steers Campaign Money to Her Political Consulting Firm James Biden’s Construction Consulting Firm Receives $1.5 Billion in Government Contracts for Projects with Which It Has No Past Experience Frank Biden Is Linked to Solar Power Projects Receiving Millions in Taxpayer Loans from the Obama Administration, Despite Having No Experience in That Field Hunter Biden’s Firms Scored Big Business Deals with People & Entities Tied to the Governments of Kazakhstan, China, and Russia Joe Biden Aggressively Promotes His Son-in-Law’s Startup Investment Consultancy Source: https://www.discoverthenetworks.org/individuals/joe-biden Colluded with Hillary Clinton:
Colluded w/ Trump:
Inspiration: America is increasingly headed towards a totalitarian Venezuela-style "election" system where the Democrats are rigging election law in order to enable the equivalent of LEGALLY stuffing ballot boxes so that they can remain in power in perpetuity.
From the Daily Caller: SCOTT MOREFIELD REPORTER December 01, 2018 "As the polls closed on election day last month, six California Republican House candidates, including Representatives Dana Rohrabacher, Steve Knight, and Mimi Walters, were ahead in their respective races. However, as the absentee and provisional ballots rolled in over the intervening weeks, all six lost to their Democratic opponents. The case of Korean-American GOP candidate Young Kim was one of the most prominent examples. On election night, Kim held an 8,000 vote lead over her Democratic opponent Gil Cisneros, and even attended freshman orientation in Washington, D.C. before watching her lead, and her victory, slowly evaporate over the subsequent weeks. .... The stunning turnaround in California, of all states, can be attributed to several factors, as conservative critics like The Federalist’s Bre Payton wrote, but the most significant of those seemed to be the practice of “ballot harvesting.” Passed as a barely noticed change in the state’s vote by mail procedures in 2016 and signed by then-Governor Jerry Brown, California’s AB 1921 allows voters to give any third party — not just a relative or someone living in the same household, as was previously the law — to collect and turn in anyone else’s completed ballot. Called “ballot harvesting,” critics say the practice is ripe for fraud. Consider “Lulu,” who was recorded trying to “harvest” what she thought was a Democratic voter’s ballot in Rep. Knight’s district. It’s a “new service,” said Lulu, for “like, people who are supporting the Democratic party.” The San Francisco Chronicle reported that 250,000 such ballots were used in Orange County alone, resulting in a Democratic sweep there. .... Before its passage, a group opposed to the bill wrote: “AB 1921 would allow anybody to walk into an elections office and hand over truckloads of vote by mail envelopes with ballots inside, no questions asked, no verified records kept. It amounts to an open invitation to large-scale vote buying, voter coercion, “granny farming”, and automated forgery. AB 1921 solves no problem that a simple stamp can’t solve.” Sources: - dailycaller.com/2018/12/01/ballot-harvesting-california-dems-gop - leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billNavClient.xhtml?bill_id=201520160AB1921 Leaving the EU would be like planting ‘a bomb’ under the British economy, the prime minister warns.
By TOM MCTAGUE 6/12/16, Updated 6/13/16 David Cameron confirmed Sunday that he will pull Britain out of the single market if there is a vote to leave the European Union at the upcoming referendum. The prime minister told the BBC’s Andrew Marr show that it would be impossible to copy the Norwegian model by remaining inside the trading bloc despite being outside the EU because that would mean accepting freedom of movement and trade rules made in Brussels. He said the Brexit campaign had made it clear to voters that voting to leave also meant pulling out of the single market. The prime minister said he would accept the result as an “instruction” despite warning that leaving would be like planting a “bomb” under the British economy. There have been reports that the House of Commons, whose MPs are overwhelmingly pro-Remain, could vote against pulling out of the single market in the event of a Brexit. MPs could claim they were accepting voters’ wishes to withdraw from the EU while protecting them from the economic consequences of leaving the trading area. However, the Leave campaign has made it clear that in order to restrict immigration and strike trade deals with countries outside the EU, Britain would have to leave the single market. The Prime Minister said: “What the British public will be voting for is to leave the EU and leave the single market.” This would create a “decade of uncertainty,” he added, as the U.K. attempted to renegotiate a trade deal with the EU and countries around the world. “Far from not banging on about Europe we’d be banging on about Europe for 10 years,” he said. .... (more in the Politico article sourced below) Sources: - www.politico.eu/article/david-cameron-bbc-andrew-marr-ill-pull-uk-out-of-the-single-market-after-brexit-eu-referendum-vote-june-23-consequences-news - www.bbc.co.uk/programmes/b07gx9c9 |
Archives |